Taxes are on sale

taxes are on sale

Taxes are on sale. It just does not feel like it.

Taxes are on sale, although few people would describe them that way. Measured against the last eighty years, the federal income tax rates most Americans pay are close to the lowest on record. Most households would nonetheless swear they are paying more than ever, and they are not imagining it. Both statements are true. The income tax went on sale while several other costs rose quietly, and those other costs are the ones people notice.

The price tag, then and now

The federal income tax began in 1913 with a bottom rate of 1 percent and a top rate of 7 percent. Two world wars changed both numbers quickly. By 1944 the top rate was 94 percent on income above $200,000, and the bottom rate was 23 percent. At 94 percent, Washington was less a partner in a taxpayer’s success than its majority shareholder. Top rates stayed above 90 percent through 1963, and the lowest bracket sat at 20 percent for most of the 1950s. Many of today’s retirees were alive in 1963, although few were old enough to file a return, much less to study the rate schedule.

Statutory rates overstate what anyone actually paid. Deductions, exclusions, and income splitting kept the top 1 percent of earners in the 1950s at an average of about 17 percent of income in income taxes and 42 percent in all federal, state, and local taxes combined, according to the Tax Foundation. The better gauge for most readers is the typical family. The Tax Policy Center calculates that a median-income family of four paid 5.6 percent of its income in federal income tax in 1955, 8.7 percent in 1963, and a peak of 11.4 percent in 1980. By the mid-2010s the figure had fallen to about 5 percent, and the 2017 law then nearly doubled the standard deduction and doubled the child tax credit. The typical family’s income tax bill, measured as a share of income, is now about as low as it has been at any point since the 1950s.

The 2026 price tag looks very different. The lowest bracket is 10 percent. The top rate is 37 percent, and a married couple does not reach it until taxable income passes $768,700. After a $32,200 standard deduction, a couple filing jointly pays no more than 12 percent on taxable income up to $100,800. For a household with a typical income, most earnings are taxed at 10 or 12 percent or not taxed at all.

Average rates tell the same story. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) tracks the share of income households actually pay in federal taxes, and it found that average federal tax rates fell for every income group between 1979 and 2019, with the steepest decline at the bottom. In 2019, households in the middle fifth of the income distribution paid about 13 percent of their income in all federal taxes combined. The 2017 tax law lowered rates further, and the 2025 law made those lower brackets permanent.

In Washington, “permanent” means “until further notice.”

The tax that never went on sale

The income tax gets the headlines every April. The payroll tax collects every other Friday.

When Social Security taxes were first collected in 1937, the rate was 1 percent from the worker and 1 percent from the employer, applied to the first $3,000 of wages. By 1963, the year of the 91 percent top bracket, the Social Security rate was 3.625 percent each on the first $4,800 of wages. Medicare’s hospital insurance tax arrived in 1966 at 0.35 percent each. Today the Social Security rate is 6.2 percent each on wages up to $184,500, and the Medicare rate is 1.45 percent each on all wages, with no cap. The combined 15.3 percent rate has held since 1990, and it is the highest in the program’s history. Self-employed workers pay both halves. Wages above $200,000 for a single filer, or $250,000 for a couple, are subject to an additional 0.9 percent Medicare tax, and investment income above the same thresholds can be subject to a 3.8 percent net investment income tax.

For most working households, the payroll tax is the larger bill. The Tax Policy Center estimated in 2016 that almost two-thirds of households paid more in payroll tax than in income tax, counting the employer’s share, which economists generally treat as compensation that would otherwise have been paid as wages. A worker in the 12 percent bracket has 7.65 percent of every paycheck withheld for Social Security and Medicare before any income tax is calculated, and the employer remits another 7.65 percent.

Social Security and Medicare taxes, in short, are not part of the sale. Anyone who hears that taxes are at historic lows and then looks at a pay stub has good reason to be skeptical. The legislation now before Congress also points in the other direction.

The 2026 Trustees Reports project that the Social Security retirement trust fund will exhaust its reserves in 2032 and that Medicare’s hospital insurance fund will do the same in 2033. From those dates forward, incoming taxes would cover only part of scheduled benefits. Congress can close the gap with less spending, more revenue, or a combination of the two, and most of the current proposals rely heavily on revenue. The Social Security 2100 Act would remove the wage cap for earnings after 2026 and apply the 12.4 percent Social Security rate to net investment income for taxpayers with income above $400,000. The Strengthening Social Security Act would phase out the cap between 2028 and 2032, after which every dollar of wages would be taxed. The Medicare and Social Security Fair Share Act would apply the Social Security tax to income above $400,000 and raise the Medicare rate on that income by 1.2 percentage points. In June 2026, Sens. Bernie Moreno (R-Ohio) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) proposed raising the cap, which suggests that some Republicans now expect new revenue to be part of any solution.

None of these bills has passed, and most of them target higher earners for now. The direction, however, is clear. As 2032 approaches, the payroll tax is far more likely to rise than to fall.

Why it does not feel like a sale

Inflation raised the sticker price

Consumer prices have risen roughly 29 percent since 2020, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics consumer price index, and inflation accelerated again in 2026 as energy prices climbed. A lower tax rate on a paycheck that buys less does not register as relief. Retailers understand this well: a 30 percent discount means very little when the price tag was raised the week before.

Brackets creep, and some thresholds never move

The brackets are adjusted for inflation every year, but since the 2017 law the adjustment has used the chained consumer price index, which usually rises more slowly than the standard index that most raises and cost-of-living adjustments follow. The Joint Committee on Taxation estimated that the switch would raise about $134 billion over ten years. The annual difference is only a few tenths of a percentage point, but it compounds.

The larger problem is the thresholds that are not adjusted at all. Social Security benefits begin to be taxed once “provisional income” exceeds $25,000 for a single filer or $32,000 for a couple. Those figures took effect in 1984, the year Ghostbusters opened, and they have not changed since. The franchise has produced three sequels and a reboot since then; the thresholds have not moved once. When the tax began, fewer than one beneficiary in ten paid it. The Congressional Research Service notes that the share grows every year because the thresholds stay fixed while incomes and benefits rise. The 0.9 percent Medicare surtax and the 3.8 percent investment income tax work the same way, since their $200,000 and $250,000 thresholds have been frozen since 2013. Congress never voted for these increases. Inflation enacted them on its own.

Fewer shoulders carry the load

The sale has another catch: a large share of households pay almost nothing at the income tax register. The Tax Policy Center estimates that about 40 percent of households owed no federal income tax in 2025. Most of them are not avoiding anything. Roughly 70 percent earn less than $75,000, many are retirees living mainly on Social Security, and many working families see their liability erased by the standard deduction and by refundable credits such as the Earned Income Tax Credit and the Child Tax Credit. Most of the working households in this group still pay Social Security and Medicare taxes, often more than they receive back in refundable credits.

The income tax itself, however, rests on a narrow base. IRS data for tax year 2023, compiled by the Tax Foundation, show that the top half of filers paid 96.7 percent of all federal income taxes and the bottom half paid 3.3 percent. The top 1 percent earned about 21 percent of the income and paid about 38 percent of the tax, at an average rate of 26.3 percent, compared with 3.7 percent for the bottom half. Each deduction or credit that takes another household off the rolls leaves the remaining payers to cover the difference, either through rates today or through borrowing that must be repaid later. A sale offered to fewer and fewer customers rarely feels like a bargain to the ones still paying full price.

The state and local bill moved the other way

State income taxes have mostly been falling. At least eight states lowered their income tax rates on January 1, 2026, according to the Tax Foundation, and several are moving toward a flat rate or no income tax at all. Property taxes moved in the opposite direction. ATTOM, a real estate data firm, found that the average property tax bill on a single-family home rose 3 percent in 2025 to $4,427, even though average home values declined slightly. The effective property tax rate reached its highest level since 2020. Once sales taxes and local fees are added, many households pay more to their local governments even as their income tax rates fall.

Medicare premiums are a tax by another name

Retirees feel this cost directly. The standard Medicare Part B premium rose 9.7 percent to $202.90 a month in 2026, and it is deducted from the Social Security check before the retiree sees it. Higher-income retirees also pay an income-related surcharge known as IRMAA. The government calls the charge a premium. When it grows faster than the cost-of-living adjustment, as The Senior Citizens League reports it has for three consecutive years, the household budget is unlikely to see much distinction.

The tax bomb is already built

Americans held $51.2 trillion in retirement assets at the end of June 2026, according to the Investment Company Institute, including $19.9 trillion in IRAs and $15.0 trillion in 401(k)-type plans. Much of that money sits in traditional, pre-tax accounts and has never been taxed. The tax on it was deferred, not forgiven. Required minimum distributions will eventually force it out, stack it on top of Social Security, and pull more of each benefit into taxable income along the way. Many retirees find that their tax rate in retirement is not much lower than it was during their working years, and some find that it is higher. A sale is difficult to enjoy when the bill is already in the mail.

Several of today’s discounts also carry expiration dates. The 2025 law’s additional $6,000 deduction for taxpayers 65 and older runs only through 2028, and the higher cap on the state and local tax deduction reverts to $10,000 in 2030.

Someone has to pay for the cart

This reason is the hardest to dismiss. In fiscal year 2026, the federal government collected about $5.4 trillion and spent about $7.4 trillion, leaving a deficit of $2.0 trillion, according to CBO. Total federal debt passed $40 trillion in August 2026. Net interest on the debt exceeded $1 trillion for the year, more than the government spent on defense or Medicaid, and CBO projects that it will reach about $2.1 trillion a year by 2036.

Neither party has shown much appetite for the spending side of the ledger. CBO estimates that the 2025 tax law will add about $3.4 trillion to deficits over ten years, and several of the Social Security bills described above would raise benefits as well as taxes. When the cart is this full, someone eventually pays at the register, and households with large balances in tax-deferred accounts are an obvious place for lawmakers to look.

New shoppers are joining the line

The political landscape is shifting as well. Democratic socialists have begun winning races that would have been long shots a decade ago. Zohran Mamdani, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), was elected mayor of New York City in November 2025 on a platform that included fare-free buses, universal child care, and city-run grocery stores, financed largely through higher taxes on millionaires and corporations. A Brookings Institution review counted 282 DSA-endorsed candidates in the 2026 primaries. Most sought local or state offices, and fewer than half of those running for Congress or statewide office won their primaries, so the movement’s reach remains limited. Its victories are real nonetheless, including a 2026 primary defeat of a sitting congressman in New York’s 13th District. Whether the movement can translate those gains into a lasting bloc in Congress remains an open question, and the answer will shape the spending debate for years.

A candid opinion

The following is my opinion. Every dollar Washington does not spend is a dollar it does not have to tax or borrow. Reducing spending of every type, entitlements and defense included, would lessen the need for tax increases in the years ahead. I also expect that a larger democratic socialist presence in Congress would bring more pressure to fund programs in areas the federal government has never paid for, and new programs are rarely smaller ten years after they begin. None of this is certain. Until spending growth slows, however, today’s low rates are a sale with no end date printed on the sign, which is the riskiest kind of sale to ignore. Finally, funding anything with 40% of households contributing nothing should be unrealistic and yet it is reality. You can say what you want about taxing the rich, but even minor changes to broaden the tax base to something would fix a lot of the problem and maybe alert more people to spending realities.

Shopping while the sale lasts

If tax rates are more likely to rise than fall over the next two decades, the practical question is how to buy at today’s prices.

A Roth conversion moves money from a traditional IRA into a Roth IRA and pays the tax now, at today’s rates, rather than later at whatever rate Congress eventually sets. The least expensive years for a conversion are often the ones between retirement and the start of Social Security and required distributions, when income is low and the 10 and 12 percent brackets sit largely unused. Filling those brackets deliberately is one of the simplest ways to pay the sale price.

Tax diversification spreads savings across taxable, tax-deferred, and tax-free accounts so that no single future tax rate controls an entire retirement. Most people reach retirement with nearly everything in the tax-deferred category and almost nothing in the tax-free one.

Coordination is where most of the money is made or lost. A conversion that looks sensible in isolation can raise a Medicare premium two years later or make more of a Social Security benefit taxable. A multiyear projection that considers the brackets, the IRMAA tiers, and Social Security together is the best way to distinguish a genuine bargain from an expensive impulse purchase, and a retirement income advisor can prepare one.

Taxes are on sale. It just does not feel like it. No one rings a bell when a sale ends; the prices simply change.

About the author

Jeff Batson, MBA, RFC®, is a retirement income advisor with Goat Planning in Staunton, Virginia, serving clients in 20 states. A Navy veteran, he is the author of Don’t Run Out: A Practical Guide to Social Security, Medicare, and Tax-Smart Retirement Income. Learn more at goatplanning.com.


This article is for educational purposes only and is not legal, tax, or financial advice. It draws on sources believed to be reliable, and any opinions are not predictive of future events. Please consult a qualified professional about your own situation. This content has not been reviewed by FINRA.